↓ Skip to main content

In Vivo Tumor Vasculature Targeting of CuS@MSN Based Theranostic Nanomedicine

Overview of attention for article published in ACS Nano, April 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
94 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
In Vivo Tumor Vasculature Targeting of CuS@MSN Based Theranostic Nanomedicine
Published in
ACS Nano, April 2015
DOI 10.1021/nn507241v
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Actively targeted theranostic nanomedicine may be the key for future personalized cancer management. Although numerous types of theranostic nanoparticles have been developed in the last decade for cancer treatment, challenges still exist in the engineering of biocompatible theranostic nanoparticles with highly specific in vivo tumor targeting capabilities. Here, we report the design, synthesis, surface engineering, and in vivo active vasculature targeting of a new category of theranostic nanoparticle for future cancer management. Water-soluble photothermally sensitive copper sulfide nanoparticles were encapsulated in biocompatible mesoporous silica shells, followed by multi-step surface engineering to form the final theranostic nanoparticle. Systematic in vitro targeting, an in vivo long-term toxicity study, photothermal ablation evaluation, in vivo vasculature targeted imaging, and biodistribution and histology studies were performed to fully explore the potential of these as-developed new theranostic nanoparticles.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Unknown 92 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 20 21%
Researcher 16 17%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 6 6%
Student > Postgraduate 4 4%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 29 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemistry 16 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 9%
Materials Science 7 7%
Engineering 6 6%
Other 16 17%
Unknown 32 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2022.
All research outputs
#7,548,934
of 34,297,219 outputs
Outputs from ACS Nano
#6,861
of 18,810 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,158
of 308,672 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ACS Nano
#111
of 272 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 18,810 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 308,672 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 272 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.