↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic Factors for Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Dogs

Overview of attention for article published in Veterinary Pathology, December 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (87th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
patent
6 patents
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
460 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Prognostic Factors for Cutaneous and Subcutaneous Soft Tissue Sarcomas in Dogs
Published in
Veterinary Pathology, December 2010
DOI 10.1177/0300985810388820
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Soft tissue sarcomas (STSs) develop from mesenchymal cells of soft tissues, and they commonly occur in the skin and subcutis of the dog. Although phenotypically diverse with frequently controversial histogenesis, STSs are considered as a group because they have similar features microscopically and clinically. Following resection, local recurrence rates are low in general but vary according to histologic grade and completeness of surgical margins. Complete margins predict nonrecurrence. Even most grade I STSs with "close" margins will not recur, but propensity for recurrence increases with grade. The frequency of metastasis has not been accurately estimated, but it is believed to be rare for grade I STSs and most likely to occur with grade III STSs. However, metastasis does not necessarily equate with poor survival. High mitotic index is prognostic for reduced survival time. Further research is needed to determine more precise estimates for recurrence rates and survival as related to completeness of surgical margins and to delineate potential differences in metastatic rate and median survival time between grades. Other potential indicators of prognosis that presently require further investigation include histologic type, tumor dimension, location, invasiveness, stage, markers of cellular proliferation, and cytogenetic profiles. Common issues limiting prognostic factor evaluation include biases from retrospective studies, small sample sizes, poor verification of metastasis, inconsistent STS classification and use of nomenclature, difficulties in differentiating STS phenotype, and diversity of the study population (stage of disease and treatment status).

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 460 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 453 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 58 13%
Other 56 12%
Researcher 37 8%
Student > Bachelor 35 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 35 8%
Other 108 23%
Unknown 131 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 178 39%
Medicine and Dentistry 92 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 8%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 <1%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 <1%
Other 13 3%
Unknown 135 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2025.
All research outputs
#4,022,048
of 27,783,697 outputs
Outputs from Veterinary Pathology
#123
of 1,995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,371
of 204,115 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Veterinary Pathology
#2
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,783,697 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,995 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,115 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.