| Title |
Niall Shanks, C. Ray Greek Animal Models in the Light of Evolution Boca Raton: BrownWalker Press; 2009. 443 pages, ISBN-10: 1599425025 ISBN-13: 9781599425023
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1747-5341-5-12 |
| Authors |
Lewis Wolpert |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 8 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 2 | 25% |
| Researcher | 2 | 25% |
| Student > Master | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 13% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 13% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 13% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 13% |
| Engineering | 1 | 13% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 September 2010.
All research outputs
#22,759,452
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#229
of 234 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#99,194
of 104,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine
#5
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 234 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,228 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.