↓ Skip to main content

Telemedicine interventions for substance-use disorder: a literature review

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, November 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
5 policy sources
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Telemedicine interventions for substance-use disorder: a literature review
Published in
Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare, November 2011
DOI 10.1258/jtt.2011.110608
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A literature review was conducted to identify research into multiple-contact (i.e. extended) telemedicine interventions for substance-use disorder. The goals were: (1) to describe the methodology used to evaluate telemedicine interventions; (2) to identify the range of interventions which have been formally evaluated; and (3) to summarize the findings. Fourteen databases and Google Scholar were searched, as well as bibliographies of relevant papers and online conference abstracts. There were 50 studies which met the inclusion criteria, of which 50% were randomized controlled trials. The studies most frequently reported the effect on substance use and 61% of those findings fully supported telemedicine interventions. Although the studies reported persistent challenges in sustaining participation, 76% of the studies reporting on satisfaction indicated that participants were enthusiastic supporters of telemedicine. Only 30% of reviewed studies addressed the effect on resource utilization. The majority of studies reported evidence of clinical effectiveness, which justifies continued research in the field.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 3%
United Kingdom 2 2%
Norway 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 82 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 18 20%
Student > Bachelor 14 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 16%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 6%
Other 18 20%
Unknown 12 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 23 26%
Psychology 19 21%
Social Sciences 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 11 12%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 November 2021.
All research outputs
#2,488,903
of 28,818,276 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
#93
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,142
of 258,737 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Telemedicine and Telecare
#2
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,818,276 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 258,737 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.