↓ Skip to main content

Dual Expression Lentiviral Vectors for Concurrent RNA Interference and Rescue

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Surgical Research, March 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (66th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
20 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Dual Expression Lentiviral Vectors for Concurrent RNA Interference and Rescue
Published in
Journal of Surgical Research, March 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.jss.2009.02.004
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

RNA interference (RNAi) is a powerful new tool for the selective ablation of gene expression, facilitating loss-of-function studies. However, appropriate controls are considered essential to confirm the specificity of RNAi experiments. The most stringent control is rescue of the target gene in a form that is refractory to RNAi. To facilitate rescue of the target gene, we have created improved dual expression lentiviral vectors with the ability to simultaneously drive expression of a shRNA for RNA interference and a rescue transgene in a single vector system. In proof-of-principle experiments, we ablated more than 90% of target gene expression by targeting either the open reading frame, or the 3' UTR region. Target gene expression was successfully rescued with a cDNA containing silent third-codon point mutations in the targeted region or with native cDNA when the 3' UTR was targeted. Finally, expression of the rescue transgene can be manipulated by positional cloning and appropriate promoter selection. The dual expression lentiviral vectors described here represent a versatile strategy for confirming the integrity of RNAi experiments and may facilitate functional analyses even in the absence of an established gain-of-function model system.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 20 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 10%
Unknown 18 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 25%
Researcher 5 25%
Professor > Associate Professor 2 10%
Unspecified 1 5%
Professor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 35%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 20%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 15%
Unspecified 1 5%
Unknown 5 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 September 2023.
All research outputs
#7,527,428
of 34,217,933 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Surgical Research
#1,062
of 7,119 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,647
of 150,387 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Surgical Research
#4
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,217,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,119 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 150,387 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.