↓ Skip to main content

H0LiCOW – X. Spectroscopic/imaging survey and galaxy-group identification around the strong gravitational lens system WFI 2033−4723

Overview of attention for article published in Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, September 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
28 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
H0LiCOW – X. Spectroscopic/imaging survey and galaxy-group identification around the strong gravitational lens system WFI 2033−4723
Published in
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, September 2019
DOI 10.1093/mnras/stz2483
Authors

D Sluse, C E Rusu, C D Fassnacht, A Sonnenfeld, J Richard, M W Auger, L Coccato, K C Wong, S H Suyu, T Treu, A Agnello, S Birrer, V Bonvin, T Collett, F Courbin, S Hilbert, L V E Koopmans, O Tihhanova, P J Marshall, G Meylan, A J Shajib, J Annis, S Avila, E Bertin, D Brooks, E Buckley-Geer, D L Burke, A Carnero Rosell, M Carrasco Kind, J Carretero, F J Castander, L N da Costa, J De Vicente, S Desai, P Doel, A E Evrard, B Flaugher, J Frieman, J García-Bellido, D W Gerdes, D A Goldstein, R A Gruendl, J Gschwend, W G Hartley, D L Hollowood, K Honscheid, D J James, A G Kim, E Krause, K Kuehn, N Kuropatkin, M Lima, H Lin, M A G Maia, J L Marshall, P Melchior, F Menanteau, R Miquel, A A Plazas, E Sanchez, S Serrano, I Sevilla-Noarbe, M Smith, M Soares-Santos, F Sobreira, E Suchyta, M E C Swanson, G Tarle

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 28 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 21%
Researcher 5 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 11%
Student > Master 3 11%
Professor 2 7%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Physics and Astronomy 19 68%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Unknown 8 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 October 2019.
All research outputs
#5,474,960
of 28,805,922 outputs
Outputs from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#16,616
of 41,853 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,122
of 356,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society
#540
of 859 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,805,922 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 41,853 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 356,509 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 859 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.