You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Correction: ClinGen expert clinical validity curation of 164 hearing loss gene–disease pairs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genetics in Medicine, October 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1038/s41436-019-0553-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marina T. DiStefano, Sarah E. Hemphill, Andrea M. Oza, Rebecca K. Siegert, Andrew R. Grant, Madeline Y. Hughes, Brandon J. Cushman, Hela Azaiez, Kevin T. Booth, Alex Chapin, Hatice Duzkale, Tatsuo Matsunaga, Jun Shen, Wenying Zhang, Margaret Kenna, Lisa A. Schimmenti, Mustafa Tekin, Heidi L. Rehm, Ahmad N. Abou Tayoun, Sami S. Amr, on behalf of the ClinGen Hearing Loss Clinical Domain Working Group, Sonia Abdelhak, John Alexander, Karen Avraham, Neha Bhatia, Donglin Bai, Nicole Boczek, Zippora Brownstein, Rachel Burt, Yasmin Bylstra, Ignacio del Castillo, Byung Yoon Choi, Lilian Downie, Thomas Friedman, Anne Giersch, Jasmine Goh, John Greinwald, Andrew J. Griffith, Amy Hernandez, Jeffrey Holt, Makoto Hosoya, Lim Jiin Ying, Kanika Jain, Un-Kyung Kim, Hannie Kremer, Ian Krantz, Suzanne Leal, Morag Lewis, Xue Zhong Liu, Wendy Low, Yu Lu, Minjie Luo, Saber Masmoudi, Tan Yuen Ming, Miguel Angel Moreno-Pelayo, Matías Morín, Cynthia Morton, Jaclyn Murray, Hideki Mutai, Kiyomitsu Nara, Arti Pandya, Sylvia Kam Pei-Rong, Richard J.H. Smith, Saumya Shekhar Jamuar, Funda Elif Suer, Shin-Ichi Usami, Guy Van Camp, Kazuki Yamazawa, Hui-Jun Yuan, Elizabeth Black-Zeigelbein, Keijan Zhang |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 4 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 1 | 25% |
| Researcher | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 1 | 25% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2019.
All research outputs
#22,880,741
of 28,007,560 outputs
Outputs from Genetics in Medicine
#2,923
of 3,146 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#282,542
of 367,858 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics in Medicine
#44
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,007,560 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,146 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,858 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.