↓ Skip to main content

NKT cells, Treg, and their interactions in bone marrow transplantation

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Immunology, June 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
65 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
NKT cells, Treg, and their interactions in bone marrow transplantation
Published in
European Journal of Immunology, June 2010
DOI 10.1002/eji.201040394
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Bone marrow transplantation (BMT) is a potentially curative treatment for patients with leukemia and lymphoma. Tumor eradication is promoted by the anti-tumor activity of donor T cells contained in the transplant; however, donor T cells also mediate the serious side effect of graft-versus-host disease (GVHD). Separation of GVHD from graft anti-tumor activity is an important goal of research in improving transplant outcome. One approach is to take advantage of the immunomodulatory activity of regulatory NKT cells and CD4(+)CD25(+) Treg of host and/or donor origin. Both host and donor NKT cells and donor Treg are able to prevent GVHD in murine models. In this review, we summarize the mechanisms of NKT cell- and Treg-mediated protection against GVHD in mice while maintaining graft anti-tumor activity. In addition, we also examine the interactions between NKT cells and Treg in the context of BMT, and integrate the data from murine experimental models with the observations made in humans.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 65 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Turkey 1 2%
Japan 1 2%
United Kingdom 1 2%
Canada 1 2%
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 59 91%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 15 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 11 17%
Student > Master 11 17%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 11%
Student > Postgraduate 6 9%
Other 14 22%
Unknown 1 2%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 38%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 16 25%
Immunology and Microbiology 9 14%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 3 5%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2017.
All research outputs
#8,220,458
of 24,627,841 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Immunology
#2,557
of 6,824 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,857
of 98,850 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Immunology
#12
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,627,841 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,824 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 23rd percentile – i.e., 23% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 98,850 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.