↓ Skip to main content

Comparative energetic assessment of methanol production from CO2: Chemical versus electrochemical process

Overview of attention for article published in Applied Energy, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (67th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
patent
7 patents

Readers on

mendeley
274 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Comparative energetic assessment of methanol production from CO2: Chemical versus electrochemical process
Published in
Applied Energy, March 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.apenergy.2015.12.027
Authors

Haitham Al-Kalbani, Jin Xuan, Susana García, Huizhi Wang

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 274 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Unknown 272 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 36 13%
Researcher 35 13%
Student > Bachelor 17 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 4%
Other 29 11%
Unknown 108 39%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 50 18%
Engineering 35 13%
Chemistry 30 11%
Energy 10 4%
Environmental Science 6 2%
Other 13 5%
Unknown 130 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2025.
All research outputs
#6,282,557
of 28,583,110 outputs
Outputs from Applied Energy
#1,233
of 5,546 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,847
of 317,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Applied Energy
#19
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,583,110 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,546 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 317,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.