| Title |
Epidemiological models for the spread of anti-malarial resistance
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Malaria Journal, February 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2875-2-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
JC Koella, R Antia |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 19% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 13% |
| France | 2 | 6% |
| Vietnam | 1 | 3% |
| India | 1 | 3% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 3% |
| Spain | 1 | 3% |
| Australia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 15 | 47% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 52 | 163% |
| Student > Master | 29 | 91% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 81% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 38% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 34% |
| Other | 42 | 131% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 71 | 222% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 75% |
| Mathematics | 22 | 69% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 11 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 11 | 34% |
| Other | 25 | 78% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2005.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Malaria Journal
#2,545
of 5,918 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,935
of 61,909 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Malaria Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,918 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 61,909 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them