↓ Skip to main content

Assessment of Human Patient Simulation-Based Learning

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, December 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
127 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Assessment of Human Patient Simulation-Based Learning
Published in
American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, December 2011
DOI 10.5688/ajpe7510208
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The most common types of assessment of human patient simulation are satisfaction and/or confidence surveys or tests of knowledge acquisition. There is an urgent need to develop valid, reliable assessment instruments related to simulation-based learning. Assessment practices for simulation-based activities in the pharmacy curricula are highlighted, with a focus on human patient simulation. Examples of simulation-based assessment activities are reviewed according to type of assessment or domain being assessed. Assessment strategies are suggested for faculty members and programs that use simulation-based learning.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 127 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
Sweden 1 <1%
Ireland 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 121 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 13%
Student > Bachelor 15 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 15 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 9%
Lecturer 9 7%
Other 35 28%
Unknown 25 20%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 33 26%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 14%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 16 13%
Social Sciences 12 9%
Psychology 4 3%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 28 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 August 2014.
All research outputs
#19,782,631
of 30,529,933 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
#975
of 1,665 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#196,468
of 273,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 30,529,933 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,665 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.