↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#40 of 6,307)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
30 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
policy
6 policy sources
twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
485 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Systematic review of beliefs, behaviours and influencing factors associated with disclosure of a mental health problem in the workplace
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, February 2012
DOI 10.1186/1471-244x-12-11
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Stigma and discrimination present an important barrier to finding and keeping work for individuals with a mental health problem. This paper reviews evidence on: 1) employment-related disclosure beliefs and behaviours of people with a mental health problem; 2) factors associated with the disclosure of a mental health problem in the employment setting; 3) whether employers are less likely to hire applicants who disclose a mental health problem; and 4) factors influencing employers' hiring beliefs and behaviours towards job applicants with a mental health problem.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 485 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Botswana 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 476 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 85 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 80 16%
Researcher 57 12%
Student > Bachelor 43 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 31 6%
Other 71 15%
Unknown 118 24%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 101 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 68 14%
Social Sciences 58 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 43 9%
Business, Management and Accounting 35 7%
Other 53 11%
Unknown 127 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 266. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 December 2024.
All research outputs
#153,927
of 28,667,723 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#40
of 6,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#541
of 176,070 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#1
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 28,667,723 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,307 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,070 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.