↓ Skip to main content

Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2014: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), August 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (79th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
1 patent

Readers on

mendeley
46 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Pancreatic adenocarcinoma, version 2.2014: featured updates to the NCCN guidelines.
Published in
Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN), August 2014
DOI 10.6004/jnccn.2014.0106
Pubmed ID
Authors

Margaret A Tempero, Mokenge P Malafa, Stephen W Behrman, Al B Benson, Ephraim S Casper, E Gabriela Chiorean, Vincent Chung, Steven J Cohen, Brian Czito, Anitra Engebretson, Mary Feng, William G Hawkins, Joseph Herman, John P Hoffman, Andrew Ko, Srinadh Komanduri, Albert Koong, Andrew M Lowy, Wen Wee Ma, Nipun B Merchant, Sean J Mulvihill, Peter Muscarella, Eric K Nakakura, Jorge Obando, Martha B Pitman, Sushanth Reddy, Aaron R Sasson, Sarah P Thayer, Colin D Weekes, Robert A Wolff, Brian M Wolpin, Jennifer L Burns, Deborah A Freedman-Cass

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 46 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 46 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 11%
Other 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 4 9%
Professor 3 7%
Other 5 11%
Unknown 15 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 26 57%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 4%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 2%
Unknown 15 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 October 2016.
All research outputs
#4,666,258
of 34,640,154 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#649
of 2,300 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,434
of 273,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network (JNCCN)
#4
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,640,154 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,300 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.