↓ Skip to main content

Group Peer Mentoring: An Answer to the Faculty Mentoring Problem? A Successful Program at a Large Academic Department of Medicine

Overview of attention for article published in The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
157 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Group Peer Mentoring: An Answer to the Faculty Mentoring Problem? A Successful Program at a Large Academic Department of Medicine
Published in
The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals, January 2015
DOI 10.1002/chp.21296
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 157 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 157 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 15 10%
Researcher 14 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 12 8%
Other 36 23%
Unknown 46 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 27 17%
Social Sciences 21 13%
Psychology 14 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 7 4%
Other 24 15%
Unknown 53 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 June 2019.
All research outputs
#23,296,582
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals
#432
of 709 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,534
of 409,678 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Continuing Education for Health Professionals
#13
of 28 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 709 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 409,678 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 28 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.