You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Timeline
Attention over time
Attention Score history
Activity
X Demographics
Mendeley demographics
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
White matter hyperintensity quantification in large-scale clinical acute ischemic stroke cohorts – The MRI-GENIE study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
NeuroImage: Clinical, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101884 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Markus D. Schirmer, Adrian V. Dalca, Ramesh Sridharan, Anne-Katrin Giese, Kathleen L. Donahue, Marco J. Nardin, Steven J.T. Mocking, Elissa C. McIntosh, Petrea Frid, Johan Wasselius, John W. Cole, Lukas Holmegaard, Christina Jern, Jordi Jimenez-Conde, Robin Lemmens, Arne G. Lindgren, James F. Meschia, Jaume Roquer, Tatjana Rundek, Ralph L. Sacco, Reinhold Schmidt, Pankaj Sharma, Agnieszka Slowik, Vincent Thijs, Daniel Woo, Achala Vagal, Huichun Xu, Steven J. Kittner, Patrick F. McArdle, Braxton D. Mitchell, Jonathan Rosand, Bradford B. Worrall, Ona Wu, Polina Golland, Natalia S. Rost, on behalf of the MRI-GENIE Investigators |
Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 22 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 27% |
| Mexico | 2 | 9% |
| Papua New Guinea | 1 | 5% |
| Austria | 1 | 5% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| Germany | 1 | 5% |
| Guinea | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 7 | 32% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 55% |
| Scientists | 6 | 27% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 5% |
Mendeley demographics
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 115 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 115 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 12% |
| Researcher | 14 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 6% |
| Other | 20 | 17% |
| Unknown | 39 | 34% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 14% |
| Unspecified | 12 | 10% |
| Neuroscience | 11 | 10% |
| Computer Science | 7 | 6% |
| Engineering | 5 | 4% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 53 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 May 2023.
All research outputs
#3,271,948
of 27,521,961 outputs
Outputs from NeuroImage: Clinical
#418
of 2,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,333
of 368,748 outputs
Outputs of similar age from NeuroImage: Clinical
#12
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,521,961 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,868 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,748 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.