↓ Skip to main content

Compression use during an exercise intervention and associated changes in breast cancer–related lymphedema

Overview of attention for article published in Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
138 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Compression use during an exercise intervention and associated changes in breast cancer–related lymphedema
Published in
Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology, March 2016
DOI 10.1111/ajco.12471
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study assessed the association between compression use and changes in lymphedema observed in women with breast cancer-related lymphedema who completed a 12-week exercise intervention. This work uses data collected from a 12 week exercise trial, whereby women were randomly allocated into either aerobic-based only (n = 21) or resistance-based only (n = 20) exercise. Compression use during the trial was at the participants discretion. Differences in lymphedema (measured by lymphedema index [L-Dex] score and interlimb circumference difference [%]) and associated symptoms between those who wore, and did not wear compression during the 12-week intervention were assessed. We also explored participants' reasons surrounding compression during exercise. No significant interaction effect between time and compression use for lymphedema was observed. There was no difference between groups over time in the number or severity of lymphedema symptoms. Irrespective of compression use, there were trends for reductions in the proportion of women reporting severe symptoms, but lymphedema status did not change. Individual reasons for the use of compression, or lack thereof, varied markedly. Our findings demonstrated an absence of a positive or negative effect from compression use during exercise on lymphedema. Current and previous findings suggest the clinical recommendation that garments must be worn during exercise is questionable, and its application requires an individualized approach.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 138 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Portugal 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 136 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 20 14%
Student > Bachelor 15 11%
Researcher 15 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 6 4%
Other 26 19%
Unknown 46 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 33 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 26 19%
Sports and Recreations 13 9%
Unspecified 3 2%
Computer Science 2 1%
Other 7 5%
Unknown 54 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 March 2022.
All research outputs
#23,230,020
of 34,297,219 outputs
Outputs from Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
#331
of 705 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#204,866
of 337,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Asia Pacific Journal of Clinical Oncology
#13
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,297,219 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 705 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.