↓ Skip to main content

A rash diagnosis: Gemcitabine-associated pseudocellulitis

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, June 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
25 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
A rash diagnosis: Gemcitabine-associated pseudocellulitis
Published in
Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice, June 2016
DOI 10.1177/1078155216635852
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Gemcitabine is an antitumor agent with broad clinical application. The most common cutaneous toxicities are mild rash and pruritus; however, a severe 'pseudocellulitis' rash, which resembles infectious cellulitis in clinical presentation, has increasingly been recognized as a rare complication of this agent. Though the specific pathophysiology related to this condition is not clear, it has been observed to occur primarily in regions of significant lymphadenopathy or prior radiation exposure typically after 24-48 h following administration of gemcitabine. It is a self-limiting reaction, with most cases resolving within two to seven days of onset without any specific treatment for the rash. Treatment with gemcitabine may be safely continued in patients with this complication, though recurrence of the rash is common following repeated doses. We report a case of biopsy confirmed gemcitabine associated pseudocellulitis in a patient treated for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Knowledge of this complication is important to avoid unwarranted hospitalizations and antibiotic use in patients treated with gemcitabine.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 25 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 25 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 3 12%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 8%
Student > Postgraduate 2 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 4%
Other 3 12%
Unknown 11 44%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 40%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Materials Science 1 4%
Unknown 12 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2016.
All research outputs
#14,713,318
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
#610
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#210,456
of 352,727 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Oncology Pharmacy Practice
#40
of 76 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 352,727 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 76 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.