You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effects of Harvesting Forest Biomass on Water and Climate Regulation Services: A Synthesis of Long-Term Ecosystem Experiments in Eastern North America
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Ecosystems, October 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10021-015-9928-z |
| Authors |
Jesse Caputo, Colin M. Beier, Peter M. Groffman, Douglas A. Burns, Frederick D. Beall, Paul W. Hazlett, Thad E. Yorks |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 75% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 108 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Mexico | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 104 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 24 | 22% |
| Researcher | 20 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 46 | 43% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 18 | 17% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 6 | 6% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 5 | 5% |
| Engineering | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 11 | 10% |
| Unknown | 19 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 March 2016.
All research outputs
#13,461,321
of 22,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Ecosystems
#873
of 1,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,131
of 284,559 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Ecosystems
#11
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 284,559 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.