↓ Skip to main content

Risk of Intraoperative Injury of Nearby Structures: National Trend, Distribution, and Burden

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of the American College of Surgeons, January 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
23 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Risk of Intraoperative Injury of Nearby Structures: National Trend, Distribution, and Burden
Published in
Journal of the American College of Surgeons, January 2016
DOI 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.12.040
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Accidental injury of a nearby structure during surgical operations carries a risk of serious morbidity and mortality. Furthermore, it represents a medico-legal liability. We aimed to examine the national distribution, cost, and trend of accidental intraoperative injuries. We performed a cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample database. The study population consisted of patients who encountered intraoperative injuries between 2003 and 2010. Controls were randomly selected from patients who underwent similar procedures during the same period. Cost was adjusted for inflation rate to reflect 2015 dollar values. A total of 61,667 cases with intraoperative injuries and 430,424 controls were included. Intraoperative injuries were most common in procedures that involved the digestive system (38.0%), female reproductive organs (21.4%), and musculoskeletal system (12.2%). There was a significant increase in those injuries from 161.3 cases/100,000 procedures in 2003 to 254.9 cases/100,000 procedures in 2010 (p < 0.001). Female sex, pediatric and older populations, overweight, trauma and teaching hospital were all independent risk factors of injuries in the multivariate model (p < 0.05 for all). Intraoperative injuries were associated with a higher risk of concomitant complications (odds ratio [OR] 2.44, 95% CI 2.36, 2.54, p < 0.001) and hospital mortality risk (OR 2.33, 95% CI [2.15, 2.51], p < 0.001). Nationally, it is estimated that injuries of nearby structures resulted in an annual average of 84,708.7 days of excess hospital admission days and $426.33 million excess cost. Certain demographic and clinical factors influence the risk of intraoperative injury of nearby structures. The prevalence of intraoperative injuries is increasing at the national level, and these injuries are associated with increased mortality and pose substantial clinical and financial burdens.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 23 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 23 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 3 13%
Professor 3 13%
Student > Master 3 13%
Student > Postgraduate 3 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 9%
Other 3 13%
Unknown 6 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 52%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Social Sciences 2 9%
Engineering 1 4%
Unknown 6 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#16,721,717
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#3,290
of 4,354 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#232,470
of 402,343 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of the American College of Surgeons
#73
of 111 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,354 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.4. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 402,343 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 111 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.