↓ Skip to main content

Long-Term Outcomes after Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation

Overview of attention for article published in CARTILAGE, July 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (75th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet

Readers on

mendeley
133 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Long-Term Outcomes after Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation
Published in
CARTILAGE, July 2016
DOI 10.1177/1947603516630786
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) has not been proven to be durable over the long-term. The purpose of this systematic review was (1) to evaluate activity level and knee function, (2) to evaluate reoperation and failure rates, and (3) to analyze risk factors for reoperation and failure of ACI at minimum long-term follow-up. A comprehensive review was performed for studies with long-term outcomes after ACI for cartilage defect repair. Studies reported outcome scores such as Tegner score, Lysholm score, and International Knee Documentation Society (IKDC) score along with rates of failure and reoperation. Modified Coleman Methodology Scores were calculated to assess study methodological quality. Nine studies with a total of 771 patients with a mean age of 33.4 ± 2.5 years, mean defect size of 5.9 ± 1.6 cm(2), and mean follow-up of 11.4 years were included. Tegner score, Lysholm score, and IKDC score change from preoperative to final follow-up was 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.4, P < 0.001), 24.9 points (95% CI 18.8-31, P < 0.001), and 16.5 points (95% CI 5.4-27.5, P < 0.01), respectively. The mean failure and reoperation rates were 18% and 37%, respectively. Increased age and lesion size (>4.5 cm(2)) were significantly correlated with increased risk of reoperation and failure. Overall, ACI demonstrated successful outcomes in 82% of patients over the long-term. Increased patient age and lesion size greater than 4.5 cm(2) were risk factors for a higher reoperation and failure rate. Nonetheless, this review is limited by heterogeneity in surgical technique, and lesion and patient characteristics.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 133 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 16 12%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 10%
Student > Bachelor 12 9%
Other 11 8%
Other 25 19%
Unknown 42 32%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 47 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 5%
Engineering 6 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Other 15 11%
Unknown 47 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 September 2026.
All research outputs
#6,776,602
of 34,410,315 outputs
Outputs from CARTILAGE
#65
of 479 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,171
of 337,510 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CARTILAGE
#3
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,410,315 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 479 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,510 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.