↓ Skip to main content

Hydration and Fluid Replacement Knowledge, Attitudes, Barriers, and Behaviors of NCAA Division 1 American Football Players

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, November 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
13 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
145 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Hydration and Fluid Replacement Knowledge, Attitudes, Barriers, and Behaviors of NCAA Division 1 American Football Players
Published in
Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research, November 2016
DOI 10.1519/jsc.0000000000001397
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Hydration is an important part of athletic performance, and understanding athletes' hydration knowledge, attitudes, barriers, and behaviors is critical for sport practitioners. The aim of this study was to assess NCAA Division 1 (D1) American football players, with regard to hydration and fluid intake before, during, and after exercise, and to apply this assessment to their overall hydration practice. The sample consisted of 100 student-athletes from two different NCAA D1 universities, who participated in voluntary summer football conditioning. Participants completed a survey to identify the fluid and hydration knowledge, attitudes and behaviors, demographic data, primary football position, previous nutrition education, and barriers to adequate fluid consumption. The average hydration knowledge score (HKS) for the participants in the present study was 11.8 ±1.9 (69.4% correct), with scores ranging from 42-100% correct. Four key misunderstandings regarding hydration, specifically related to intervals of hydration habits among the study subjects, were revealed. Only 24% of the players reported drinking enough fluids before, during, immediately after, and two hours after practice. Generalized linear model analysis predicted the outcome variable HKS (χ=28.001, p=0.045), with nutrition education (Wald χ=8.250, p=0.041) and position on the football team (χ=9.361, p=0.025) being significant predictors. "Backs" (e.g., quarterbacks, running backs, and defensive backs) demonstrated significantly higher hydration knowledge than 'Linemen' (p=0.014). Findings indicated that if changes are not made to increase hydration awareness levels among football teams, serious health consequences, including potential fatalities, could occur on the field, especially among heavier linemen.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 13 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 145 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 141 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 16 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Student > Bachelor 13 9%
Researcher 9 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 6%
Other 22 15%
Unknown 63 43%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 33 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 7%
Psychology 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 3%
Other 11 8%
Unknown 66 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 November 2016.
All research outputs
#5,960,649
of 34,559,526 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#3,078
of 7,448 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,122
of 338,535 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Strength & Conditioning Research
#53
of 101 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,559,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,448 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,535 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 101 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.