↓ Skip to main content

Automated, high‐throughput, in vivo analysis of visual function using the zebrafish

Overview of attention for article published in Developmental Dynamics, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (65th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
50 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Automated, high‐throughput, in vivo analysis of visual function using the zebrafish
Published in
Developmental Dynamics, March 2016
DOI 10.1002/dvdy.24398
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Modern genomics has enabled the identification of an unprecedented number of genetic variants, which in many cases are extremely rare, associated with blinding disorders. A significant challenge will be determining the pathophysiology of each new variant. The zebrafish is an excellent model for the study of inherited diseases of the eye. By 5 days-post-fertilization (dpf) they have quantifiable behavioral responses to visual stimuli. However, visual behavior assays can take several hours to perform or can only be assessed one fish at a time. To increase the throughput for vision assays, we used the Viewpoint Zebrabox to automate the visual startle response and created software, Visual Interrogation of Zebrafish Manipulations (VIZN), to automate data analysis. This process allows 96 zebrafish larvae to be tested and resultant data to be analyzed in under 35 minutes. We validated this system by disrupting function of a gene necessary for photoreceptor differentiation and observing decreased response to visual stimuli. This automated method along with VIZN allows rapid, high-throughput, in vivo testing of zebrafish's ability to respond to light/dark stimuli. This allows the rapid analysis of novel genes involved in visual function by morpholino, CRISPRS, or small molecule drug screens. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 49 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 8 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 14%
Researcher 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 6%
Other 7 14%
Unknown 13 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 26%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 20%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Unspecified 1 2%
Environmental Science 1 2%
Other 6 12%
Unknown 16 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 February 2018.
All research outputs
#7,866,297
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from Developmental Dynamics
#672
of 2,095 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,634
of 304,145 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Developmental Dynamics
#8
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,095 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,145 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.