↓ Skip to main content

Relationship Between Tissue Unscrolling Time and Endothelial Cell Loss

Overview of attention for article published in Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, April 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
21 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Relationship Between Tissue Unscrolling Time and Endothelial Cell Loss
Published in
Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease, April 2016
DOI 10.1097/ico.0000000000000771
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

To assess the relationship between intraoperative unscrolling time of the donor Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissue and 6-month postoperative endothelial cell loss (ECL), and to determine whether donor age, scroll tightness, and the presence of an S stamp are related to unscrolling time. Ninety-three consecutive uncomplicated DMEK surgeries performed on eyes with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy using our standardized technique (ie, prestripped tissue with or without a premarked S stamp from our eye bank, overstripping the recipient, Straiko glass injector, no-touch tap technique, and bubble of 20% SF6 gas) were evaluated. Intraoperative unscrolling times and 6-month endothelial cell densities were measured and analyzed. Sixty-nine cases comprised the study cohort. The median unscrolling time was 4 minutes (range: 0.8-17.5 minutes), and the median ECL was 26.9% (range: -4.3% to 80.0%). There was no relationship between unscrolling time and ECL at 6 months by the Pearson correlation coefficient (r = -0.02, P = 0.89). Younger donor age, tighter scrolls, and absence of an S stamp had no correlation with longer unscrolling times (all P > 0.05). Only 2 of 4 cases of iatrogenic primary graft failure had unscrolling times available for analysis; in this limited sample, there was no association between iatrogenic primary graft failure and unscrolling time. Once the DMEK tissue is safely in the anterior chamber, surgeons need not rush the "DMEK dance" because longer unscrolling times may not endanger the endothelium.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 21 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 21 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 5 24%
Student > Bachelor 3 14%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Master 2 10%
Lecturer 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 6 29%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 38%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Chemistry 1 5%
Unknown 11 52%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2016.
All research outputs
#31,181,820
of 34,360,257 outputs
Outputs from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#3,479
of 4,160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#298,589
of 338,441 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cornea : The Journal of Cornea and External Disease
#43
of 63 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,360,257 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,160 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,441 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 63 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.