↓ Skip to main content

Method for rearing the orb-web spider Cyclosa argenteoalba

Overview of attention for article published in Acta Arachnologica, January 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Readers on

mendeley
3 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Method for rearing the orb-web spider Cyclosa argenteoalba
Published in
Acta Arachnologica, January 2015
DOI 10.2476/asjaa.64.75
Authors

Yusuke Shigemiya, Kensuke Nakata

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 3 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 33%
Unknown 2 67%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor 1 33%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 33%
Student > Postgraduate 1 33%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2020.
All research outputs
#7,397,069
of 24,357,902 outputs
Outputs from Acta Arachnologica
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#96,488
of 361,864 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Arachnologica
#1
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,357,902 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 0.0. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 361,864 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them