| Title |
Rethinking primary care user fees: is charging a fee for appointments a solution to NHS underfunding?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
British Journal of General Practice, May 2019
|
| DOI | 10.3399/bjgp19x703793 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Geva Greenfield, Buland Majeed, Benedict Hayhoe, Salman Rawaf, Azeem Majeed |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 66 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 31 | 47% |
| United States | 2 | 3% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | 2% |
| Senegal | 1 | 2% |
| France | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 29 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 40 | 61% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 13 | 20% |
| Scientists | 12 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 7 | 26% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 15% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 22% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
| Psychology | 1 | 4% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 11 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 April 2024.
All research outputs
#573,814
of 25,784,004 outputs
Outputs from British Journal of General Practice
#236
of 4,936 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,286
of 365,289 outputs
Outputs of similar age from British Journal of General Practice
#12
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,784,004 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,936 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 365,289 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.