↓ Skip to main content

The neuroethics of non-invasive brain stimulation

Overview of attention for article published in Current Biology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Readers on

mendeley
469 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The neuroethics of non-invasive brain stimulation
Published in
Current Biology, February 2012
DOI 10.1016/j.cub.2012.01.013
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Transcranial direct current stimulation (TDCS) is a brain stimulation tool that is portable, painless, inexpensive, apparently safe, and with potential long-term efficacy. Recent results obtained from TDCS experiments offer exciting possibilities for the enhancement and treatment of normal or impaired abilities, respectively. We discuss new neuroethical problems that have emerged from the usage of TDCS, and also focus on one of the most likely future applications of TDCS: enhancing learning and cognition in children with typical and atypical development.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 469 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 7 1%
United Kingdom 6 1%
Italy 6 1%
Canada 4 <1%
Germany 3 <1%
Spain 3 <1%
France 3 <1%
Austria 2 <1%
Australia 2 <1%
Other 11 2%
Unknown 422 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 93 20%
Researcher 91 19%
Student > Master 61 13%
Student > Bachelor 49 10%
Professor 28 6%
Other 87 19%
Unknown 60 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 136 29%
Neuroscience 69 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 56 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 9%
Engineering 23 5%
Other 60 13%
Unknown 85 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 July 2025.
All research outputs
#856,285
of 32,106,825 outputs
Outputs from Current Biology
#2,720
of 16,630 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,459
of 292,561 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Current Biology
#15
of 130 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,106,825 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,630 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 63.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 292,561 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 130 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.