↓ Skip to main content

Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection for cancer and polyps: a cost-effectiveness study

Overview of attention for article published in ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Laparoscopic versus open colorectal resection for cancer and polyps: a cost-effectiveness study
Published in
ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR, September 2014
DOI 10.2147/ceor.s66247
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Poland 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Master 5 12%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Unspecified 2 5%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 2 5%
Other 8 19%
Unknown 13 31%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 36%
Unspecified 2 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 5%
Social Sciences 2 5%
Other 5 12%
Unknown 14 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 December 2024.
All research outputs
#12,344,996
of 34,363,559 outputs
Outputs from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#253
of 590 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#103,748
of 280,698 outputs
Outputs of similar age from ClinicoEconomics and Outcomes Research: CEOR
#4
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,363,559 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 590 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 280,698 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.