↓ Skip to main content
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (93rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (86th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
2 policy sources
twitter
21 X users
reddit
1 Redditor

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Progression-free survival as surrogate end point for overall survival in clinical trials of HER2-targeted agents in HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer †
Published in
Annals of Oncology, March 2016
DOI 10.1093/annonc/mdw132
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The gold standard endpoint in randomized clinical trials in metastatic breast cancer is overall survival. Although therapeutics have been approved based on progression-free survival, its use as a primary endpoint is controversial. We aimed to assess to what extent progression-free survival may be used as a surrogate for overall survival in randomized trials of anti-HER2 agents in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer. Eligible trials accrued HER2+ metastatic breast cancer patients in 1992-2008. A correlation approach was used: at the individual level, to estimate the association between investigator-assessed progression-free and overall survival using a bivariate model and at the trial level, to estimate the association between treatment effects on progression-free and overall survival. Correlation values close to 1.0 would indicate strong surrogacy. We identified 2545 eligible patients in 13 randomized trials testing trastuzumab or lapatinib. We collected individual patient data from 1963 patients and retained 1839 patients from 9 trials for analysis (7 first-line trials). During follow-up, 1072 deaths and 1462 progression or deaths occurred. The median survival time was 22 months (95% CI 21-23 months) and the median progression-free survival was 5.7 months (95% CI 5.5-6.1 months). At the individual level, the Spearman correlation was equal to ρ=0.67 (95% CI 0.66 to 0.67) corresponding to a squared correlation value of 0.45. At the trial level, the squared correlation between treatment effects (log hazard ratios) on progression-free and overall survival was provided by R2=0.51 (95% CI 0.22 to 0.81). In trials of HER2-targeted agents in HER2+ metastatic breast cancer, progression-free survival moderately correlates with overall survival at the individual level and treatment effects on progression-free survival correlate moderately with those on overall mortality, providing only modest support for considering progression-free survival as a surrogate. Progression-free survival does not completely substitute for overall survival in this setting.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Unknown 75 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Master 10 13%
Other 7 9%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 8%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 20 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 21%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 10 13%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 9%
Mathematics 3 4%
Other 11 14%
Unknown 22 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 27. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2022.
All research outputs
#1,737,298
of 32,004,021 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Oncology
#969
of 9,784 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,559
of 326,691 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Oncology
#16
of 121 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,004,021 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 9,784 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 326,691 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 121 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.