↓ Skip to main content

Challenges in Whole Exome Sequencing: An Example from Hereditary Deafness

Overview of attention for article published in PLOS ONE, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Challenges in Whole Exome Sequencing: An Example from Hereditary Deafness
Published in
PLOS ONE, February 2012
DOI 10.1371/journal.pone.0032000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 2%
United States 1 1%
Sweden 1 1%
Malaysia 1 1%
Israel 1 1%
France 1 1%
Brazil 1 1%
Unknown 76 90%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 20 24%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Postgraduate 8 10%
Student > Bachelor 7 8%
Other 16 19%
Unknown 8 10%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 29 35%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 20 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 17 20%
Computer Science 3 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 2 2%
Other 5 6%
Unknown 8 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 May 2022.
All research outputs
#9,689,065
of 34,622,316 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#81,938
of 225,269 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,933
of 204,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,365
of 3,789 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,622,316 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 225,269 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 204,587 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3,789 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its contemporaries.