↓ Skip to main content

The Significance and Challenges of Monocyte Impairment: For the Ill Patient and the Surgeon

Overview of attention for article published in Surgical Infections, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (82nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
3 patents
f1000
1 research highlight platform

Readers on

mendeley
32 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Significance and Challenges of Monocyte Impairment: For the Ill Patient and the Surgeon
Published in
Surgical Infections, March 2016
DOI 10.1089/sur.2015.245
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Trauma, major elective surgery, and overt sepsis can lead to a cascade of immunological change. A subset of these patients will have a degree of immune suppression that leads to hyporesponsive innate defenses, increasing the risk of infective co-morbidity and death. This article is an overview of monocyte impairment in the high-risk surgical patient. Specifically, our primary focus is on observations made pertaining to monocyte function and pathophysiological mechanisms underpinning this impairment. Clinical factors influencing monocyte function are also discussed. A Pubmed search was conducted to review aspects of monocyte impairment in the surgical patient. Search terms included "monocyte impairment," "immunoparalysis," and "endotoxin tolerance" cross-referenced against terms including "trauma," "major surgery," and "sepsis." Findings revealed a broad variety of monocyte defects reported in surgical patients. They ranged from altered cytokine responses, particularly ex vivo TNF-α production, to impaired antigen presentation such as depressed HLA-DR expression. The latter is the most commonly described marker of secondary infection and death. Studies of underlying mechanisms have commonly utilized a model of endotoxin tolerance with in vitro monocytes, revealing a complex array of dysregulated pathways. For our purposes, endotoxin tolerance and monocyte impairment are sufficiently similar entities to permit further study as a single subject. In the high risk patient, microRNAs (also referred to as miRNA or miR) are emerging as potential biomarkers that may modify such pathways. Creation of a reliable impaired human monocyte model could be important to all such considerations. Impairment of monocyte function continues to be predictive of nosocomial infection, multi-organ failure, and death in some surgical patients. However, the optimal marker that could identify a patient as high risk early enough, and whether it might guide potential therapy, still is yet to be proven.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 32 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Russia 1 3%
Unknown 31 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 6 19%
Researcher 6 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 16%
Student > Bachelor 4 13%
Professor 4 13%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 4 13%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 44%
Immunology and Microbiology 4 13%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 9%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 3%
Other 5 16%
Unknown 4 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 October 2026.
All research outputs
#6,189,967
of 34,782,165 outputs
Outputs from Surgical Infections
#173
of 1,111 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,879
of 338,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Surgical Infections
#5
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,782,165 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,111 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 338,746 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.