↓ Skip to main content

Process and Systems: A systems approach to embedding group consultations in the NHS

Overview of attention for article published in Future Healthcare Journal, February 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Process and Systems: A systems approach to embedding group consultations in the NHS
Published in
Future Healthcare Journal, February 2019
DOI 10.7861/futurehosp.6-1-8
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Group consultations are an important care option that is -starting to gain traction in the USA and Australia. This review summarises the likely benefits accruing from a systems -approach to implementing group consultations widely in the NHS and other socialised healthcare systems. Existing evidence is mapped to five distinct systems approaches: (1) development; (2) different age groups; (3) patient-centred pathway of care; (4) NHS system changes; and (5) education. Implications are discussed for patients and staff, who both benefit from group consultations once embedded; ranging from improved access and efficiency to more enjoyable multidisciplinary team working, improved resource management, and maintained/better outcomes. Moreover, even patients who don't attend group consultations can benefit from system effects of long-term implementation. Changing behaviour and health systems is challenging, but change requires systematic experimentation and documentation of evidence. We conclude that group consultations have unique potential for delivering system-wide benefits across the NHS.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 71 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 9 13%
Student > Master 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Student > Postgraduate 5 7%
Student > Bachelor 4 6%
Other 8 11%
Unknown 33 46%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 25%
Psychology 6 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 7%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 35 49%