↓ Skip to main content

BTS/ICS guideline for the ventilatory management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in adults

Overview of attention for article published in Thorax, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (96th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
60 X users
facebook
6 Facebook pages
wikipedia
12 Wikipedia pages
reddit
3 Redditors
guideline
4 clinical guideline sources

Readers on

mendeley
831 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
BTS/ICS guideline for the ventilatory management of acute hypercapnic respiratory failure in adults
Published in
Thorax, March 2016
DOI 10.1136/thoraxjnl-2015-208209
Pubmed ID
Authors

A Craig Davidson, Stephen Banham, Mark Elliott, Daniel Kennedy, Colin Gelder, Alastair Glossop, Alistair Colin Church, Ben Creagh-Brown, James William Dodd, Tim Felton, Bernard Foëx, Leigh Mansfield, Lynn McDonnell, Robert Parker, Caroline Marie Patterson, Milind Sovani, Lynn Thomas, On behalf of the British Thoracic Society Standards of Care Committee BTS Standards of Care Committee Member British Thoracic Society/Intensive Care Society Acute Hypercapnic Respiratory Failure Guideline Development Group

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 60 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 831 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Canada 2 <1%
Mexico 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Czechia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 824 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 90 11%
Student > Bachelor 88 11%
Student > Postgraduate 88 11%
Other 80 10%
Researcher 64 8%
Other 125 15%
Unknown 296 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 342 41%
Nursing and Health Professions 92 11%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 12 1%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 12 1%
Engineering 8 <1%
Other 44 5%
Unknown 321 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 67. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 February 2026.
All research outputs
#811,619
of 34,492,055 outputs
Outputs from Thorax
#258
of 7,402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,928
of 337,686 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Thorax
#2
of 84 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,492,055 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,402 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,686 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 84 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.