The 22 papers published in this special issue arise from a call for submissions from the participants at the 11(th) World Congress on Neurohypophysial Hormones (WCNH) in 2015. As the Chair of the Local Organising Committee (Colin Brown) and Senior Editor for this issue (Oliver Bosch), we extend our thanks to the contributors for their excellent reviews and original research articles, as well as to the many colleagues and friends who gave generously of their time to complete reviews of the submitted articles. We also thank the Editorial Board of The Journal of Neuroendocrinology for their enthusiastic support of the special issue and of the WCNH itself, along with the other meeting sponsors: the University of Otago, the University of Waikato, the Otago Centre for Neuroendocrinology, the British Society for Neuroendocrinology and the Maurice and Phyllis Paykel Trust; without their generous financial support, the meeting would not have been possible. Of course, it was the hard work of the members of the Local Organising Committee and International Advisory Committee that saw the meeting through to such great success. This article is protected by copyright. All rights reserved.
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2017.
All research outputs
#16,128,702
of 27,629,830 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuroendocrinology
#703
of 1,476 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,117
of 314,411 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuroendocrinology
#15
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,629,830 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,476 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,411 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
