↓ Skip to main content

How Have Chronic Pain Management Programs Progressed? A Mapping Review

Overview of attention for article published in Pain Practice, July 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (61st percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
How Have Chronic Pain Management Programs Progressed? A Mapping Review
Published in
Pain Practice, July 2019
DOI 10.1111/papr.12805
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 159 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 18 11%
Other 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 11 7%
Student > Master 11 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 6%
Other 32 20%
Unknown 66 42%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 29 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 25 16%
Psychology 7 4%
Neuroscience 6 4%
Unspecified 4 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 70 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 May 2022.
All research outputs
#5,857,947
of 34,156,109 outputs
Outputs from Pain Practice
#291
of 1,114 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,421
of 393,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pain Practice
#5
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,156,109 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,114 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 393,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.