↓ Skip to main content

Circadian Rhythms, Metabolism, and Chrononutrition in Rodents and Humans

Overview of attention for article published in Advances in Nutrition, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
9 news outlets
policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
googleplus
1 Google+ user
video
2 YouTube creators
podcasts
2 podcasts

Readers on

mendeley
398 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Circadian Rhythms, Metabolism, and Chrononutrition in Rodents and Humans
Published in
Advances in Nutrition, March 2016
DOI 10.3945/an.115.010777
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Chrononutrition is an emerging discipline that builds on the intimate relation between endogenous circadian (24-h) rhythms and metabolism. Circadian regulation of metabolic function can be observed from the level of intracellular biochemistry to whole-organism physiology and even postprandial responses. Recent work has elucidated the metabolic roles of circadian clocks in key metabolic tissues, including liver, pancreas, white adipose, and skeletal muscle. For example, tissue-specific clock disruption in a single peripheral organ can cause obesity or disruption of whole-organism glucose homeostasis. This review explains mechanistic insights gained from transgenic animal studies and how these data are being translated into the study of human genetics and physiology. The principles of chrononutrition have already been demonstrated to improve human weight loss and are likely to benefit the health of individuals with metabolic disease, as well as of the general population.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 398 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Unknown 394 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 51 13%
Student > Master 48 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 42 11%
Researcher 34 9%
Other 22 6%
Other 50 13%
Unknown 151 38%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 49 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 45 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 36 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 32 8%
Neuroscience 20 5%
Other 47 12%
Unknown 169 42%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 97. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 September 2025.
All research outputs
#552,285
of 34,307,719 outputs
Outputs from Advances in Nutrition
#302
of 1,739 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#7,628
of 337,867 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advances in Nutrition
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,307,719 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,739 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 65.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 337,867 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.