↓ Skip to main content

Childhood Adversity Interacts With Adult Stressful Events to Predict Reduced Likelihood of Smoking Cessation Among Women but Not Men

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Psychological Science, July 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Childhood Adversity Interacts With Adult Stressful Events to Predict Reduced Likelihood of Smoking Cessation Among Women but Not Men
Published in
Clinical Psychological Science, July 2015
DOI 10.1177/2167702615584589
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Research has documented important sex differences in associations between early stress, stress-sensitization, and psychiatric outcomes. The current study investigated whether sex differences in stress-sensitization extended to cigarette smoking cessation. Data were analyzed from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions (waves 1 and 2), selecting for current daily and non-daily smokers at wave 1 (daily smokers: n=3,499 women, 3055 men; non-daily smokers: n=451 women, 501 men). Three-way interactions between sex, childhood adversity, and past year stressful life events were modeled in the prediction of smoking cessation. Among women, stressful life events were more strongly related to lower likelihood of smoking cessation for those with a history of childhood adversity than those without. This relationship was not found among men. The stress-sensitization model may be applicable to women with regards to smoking cessation, supporting further exploration of stress-sensitization as a prevention and clinical target for smoking cessation.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Mexico 1 2%
Unknown 42 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 6 14%
Student > Bachelor 4 9%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 9 21%
Unknown 14 33%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 13 30%
Medicine and Dentistry 5 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Philosophy 1 2%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 2%
Other 2 5%
Unknown 19 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 April 2016.
All research outputs
#13,769,531
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Psychological Science
#718
of 767 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,146
of 262,924 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Psychological Science
#23
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 767 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 47.7. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 262,924 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.