↓ Skip to main content

Siblings of People Diagnosed with a Mental Disorder and Posttraumatic Growth

Overview of attention for article published in Community Mental Health Journal, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
53 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Siblings of People Diagnosed with a Mental Disorder and Posttraumatic Growth
Published in
Community Mental Health Journal, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10597-012-9498-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

This study examines the potential for posttraumatic growth (PTG) for siblings of persons diagnosed with a mental disorder. Using the posttraumatic growth Inventory we compared siblings (N = 33) with a comparison group of participants who did not experience trauma (N = 30). Our group of participants who had a sibling diagnosed with a mental disorder by a mental health professional (N = 33) reported higher PTG scores with mostly large effect sizes on most of the inventory subscales. Participants who took an active role in care giving experienced less PTG than participants who did not. Having a sibling diagnosed with a mental disorder presents an opportunity to experience PTG. Implications for the therapeutic milieus are discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 53 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 4%
India 1 2%
Unknown 50 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 23%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 13%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Researcher 5 9%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 13 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 18 34%
Social Sciences 7 13%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 8%
Neuroscience 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 5 9%
Unknown 14 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2012.
All research outputs
#18,304,874
of 22,663,150 outputs
Outputs from Community Mental Health Journal
#1,128
of 1,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#121,546
of 156,309 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Community Mental Health Journal
#9
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,663,150 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 156,309 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 31st percentile – i.e., 31% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.