↓ Skip to main content

Simulating social-ecological systems: the Island Digital Ecosystem Avatars (IDEA) consortium

Overview of attention for article published in Giga Science, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

news
3 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
8 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Readers on

mendeley
109 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Simulating social-ecological systems: the Island Digital Ecosystem Avatars (IDEA) consortium
Published in
Giga Science, March 2016
DOI 10.1186/s13742-016-0118-5
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Systems biology promises to revolutionize medicine, yet human wellbeing is also inherently linked to healthy societies and environments (sustainability). The IDEA Consortium is a systems ecology open science initiative to conduct the basic scientific research needed to build use-oriented simulations (avatars) of entire social-ecological systems. Islands are the most scientifically tractable places for these studies and we begin with one of the best known: Moorea, French Polynesia. The Moorea IDEA will be a sustainability simulator modeling links and feedbacks between climate, environment, biodiversity, and human activities across a coupled marine-terrestrial landscape. As a model system, the resulting knowledge and tools will improve our ability to predict human and natural change on Moorea and elsewhere at scales relevant to management/conservation actions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 109 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 106 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 25 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 13 12%
Student > Master 13 12%
Other 6 6%
Professor > Associate Professor 5 5%
Other 16 15%
Unknown 31 28%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 22 20%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 17%
Computer Science 7 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 4%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 3%
Other 21 19%
Unknown 33 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 September 2021.
All research outputs
#1,413,572
of 34,526,284 outputs
Outputs from Giga Science
#167
of 1,497 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,947
of 357,525 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Giga Science
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 34,526,284 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,497 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 357,525 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.