You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Combination of Commonly Examined Parameters Is a Useful Predictor of Positive 99 mTc-Labeled Pyrophosphate Scintigraphy Findings in Elderly Patients With Suspected Transthyretin Cardiac Amyloidosis
|
---|---|
Published in |
Circulation Journal, June 2019
|
DOI | 10.1253/circj.cj-19-0255 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Kyohei Marume, Seiji Takashio, Masato Nishi, Kyoko Hirakawa, Masahiro Yamamoto, Shinsuke Hanatani, Seitaro Oda, Daisuke Utsunomiya, Shinya Shiraishi, Mitsuharu Ueda, Taro Yamashita, Kenji Sakamoto, Eiichiro Yamamoto, Koichi Kaikita, Yasuhiro Izumiya, Yasuyuki Yamashita, Yukio Ando, Kenichi Tsujita |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 3 | 50% |
Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 5 | 83% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 35 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Other | 5 | 14% |
Professor | 4 | 11% |
Researcher | 3 | 9% |
Lecturer | 2 | 6% |
Student > Postgraduate | 2 | 6% |
Other | 7 | 20% |
Unknown | 12 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 13 | 37% |
Social Sciences | 2 | 6% |
Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | 3% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
Other | 2 | 6% |
Unknown | 15 | 43% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2020.
All research outputs
#8,168,749
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Journal
#469
of 2,314 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#139,969
of 368,316 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Journal
#7
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,314 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 368,316 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.