↓ Skip to main content

Factors Affecting Long-Term Results of Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass

Overview of attention for article published in Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Factors Affecting Long-Term Results of Above-Knee Femoropopliteal Bypass
Published in
Vascular and Endovascular Surgery, March 2016
DOI 10.1177/1538574415627866
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess whether individual patients' or bypass characteristics may influence long-term results of prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypasses in patients with claudication in today's endovascular era. Seventy-one consecutivee Expanded Polytetrafluoroethylene (e-PTFE) bypasses were considered. All patients presented a debilitating claudication. Patency of grafts was achieved by Kaplan-Meier method. The association between individual patients' or graft characteristics and primary patency (PP) or secondary patency (SP) was assessed via Cox regression models. An immediate technical success was achieved in all cases. No patient was lost during follow-up (8-90 months, median = 34 months). The median PP was 48 months. Occlusion occurred in 32 bypasses (45%). Eight (25%) of these were treated conservatively. Fifty-two bypasses (73%) were still patent at the end of follow-up, and 13 (25%) of these had been submitted to one or more surgical revisions. There were 2 graft infections. Of 17 (25%) patients with occluded graft at the end of follow-up, 2 (2.8%) had significant aggravation followed by limb loss. The PP was directly influenced by undetected minor distal anastomosis technical defects (hazard ratio [HR] = 5.89, P value = .000002), popliteal artery size (HR = 0.62, P value = 0.007), and distal anastomosis angle ≥40° (HR = 5.55, P value = .003). The SP was associated strictly to technical defects (HR = 11.08, P value = .000007). Multivariable analyses confirmed the influence of technical defects (HR = 6.42, P value = .000003) and anastomosis angle (HR = 1.05, P value = .009) on PP and that of technical defects on SP (HR = 10.84, P value = .00003). A significantly shorter SP was also observed after a previous failed endovascular treatment on the superficial femoral artery (HR = 3.73, P value = .02). An adequate arterial size, an ideal anastomotic angle, and the absence of minor, technical defects have a major role in prosthetic above-knee femoropopliteal bypass long-term outcome. A previous, failed endovascular procedure on the superficial femoral artery could markedly alter the natural history of patients with claudication because this approach seems to have a detrimental effect on long-term outcome of grafts needing surgical revisions.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 4 18%
Student > Postgraduate 4 18%
Other 3 14%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 5%
Student > Bachelor 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 8 36%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 36%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 9%
Neuroscience 2 9%
Social Sciences 1 5%
Engineering 1 5%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 8 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2016.
All research outputs
#20,315,221
of 22,856,968 outputs
Outputs from Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
#361
of 423 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#253,793
of 300,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Vascular and Endovascular Surgery
#11
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,856,968 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 423 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 300,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.