↓ Skip to main content

Polyamines in macroalgae: advances and future perspectives

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Phycology, September 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Polyamines in macroalgae: advances and future perspectives
Published in
Journal of Phycology, September 2015
DOI 10.1111/jpy.12325
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Polyamines (PA) are ubiquitous, small, aliphatic cations found in all living cells. In recent years the importance of these molecules for macroalgae has become evident and a substantial body of knowledge has been accumulated over the last three decades. This review summarizes research on the PAs found in macroalgae, their transport and metabolism, and their biological significance in processes such as cell division, chloroplast development, and reproduction. The involvement of PAs in environmental stress responses in macroalgae is also addressed. The discussion of PAs in this review not only demonstrates that PAs play an important role in physiological processes in macroalgae, but also clearly demonstrates the similarities and differences between PA metabolism in macroalgae and higher plants. Key areas for future research are also discussed.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 1 3%
Mexico 1 3%
Brazil 1 3%
Unknown 36 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 10 26%
Researcher 9 23%
Student > Bachelor 5 13%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 2 5%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 23 59%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 13%
Environmental Science 3 8%
Psychology 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 10%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2016.
All research outputs
#19,977,226
of 24,549,201 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Phycology
#1,565
of 1,860 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#199,766
of 273,620 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Phycology
#8
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,549,201 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,860 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 273,620 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.