↓ Skip to main content

128 Use of Chest Ct Angiography Derived Left Atrial Size as a Predictor of Diastolic Dysfunction

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cardiac Failure, August 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (60th percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
128 Use of Chest Ct Angiography Derived Left Atrial Size as a Predictor of Diastolic Dysfunction
Published in
Journal of Cardiac Failure, August 2017
DOI 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.07.137
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2019.
All research outputs
#11,671,171
of 33,165,053 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#1,548
of 2,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#138,270
of 349,656 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cardiac Failure
#30
of 57 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 33,165,053 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 64th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,822 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 349,656 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 57 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.