↓ Skip to main content

Exploring traditional and complementary medicine use by Indigenous Australian women undergoing gynaecological cancer investigations

Overview of attention for article published in Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, June 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
87 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Exploring traditional and complementary medicine use by Indigenous Australian women undergoing gynaecological cancer investigations
Published in
Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice, June 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.ctcp.2019.06.005
Pubmed ID
Authors

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Unknown 87 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Master 7 8%
Researcher 4 5%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 3%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 51 59%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 17 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 7%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Mathematics 1 1%
Other 4 5%
Unknown 53 61%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 January 2020.
All research outputs
#16,203,049
of 27,271,908 outputs
Outputs from Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
#708
of 1,228 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,357
of 372,222 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Complementary Therapies in Clinical Practice
#12
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 27,271,908 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,228 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 372,222 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.