↓ Skip to main content

Nanoparticle Targeting of Neutrophils for Improved Cancer Immunotherapy

Overview of attention for article published in Advanced Healthcare Materials, March 2016
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
patent
3 patents

Readers on

mendeley
98 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Nanoparticle Targeting of Neutrophils for Improved Cancer Immunotherapy
Published in
Advanced Healthcare Materials, March 2016
DOI 10.1002/adhm.201500998
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Cancer immunotherapy using tumor specific monoclonal antibodies presents a novel approach for cancer treatment. A monoclonal antibody TA99 specific for gp75 antigen of melanoma initiates neutrophil recruitment in tumor responsible for cancer therapy. Here, a strategy is reported for hijacking neutrophils in vivo using nanoparticles (NPs) to deliver therapeutics into tumor. In a mouse model of melanoma, it is shown that systemically delivered albumin NPs increase in tumor when TA99 antibody is injected; and the NP tumor accumulation is mediated by neutrophils. After the administration of pyropheophorbide-a loaded albumin NPs and TA99, photodynamic therapy significantly suppresses the tumor growth and increases mouse survival compared with treatment with the NPs or TA99. The study reveals a new avenue to treat cancer by NP hitchhiking of immune systems to enhance delivery of therapeutics into tumor sites.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Activity
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Login to view Mendeley reader trends over time.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
Sweden 1 1%
Unknown 97 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 26 27%
Researcher 12 12%
Student > Bachelor 10 10%
Student > Master 9 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 5%
Other 11 11%
Unknown 25 26%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 12 12%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 11 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 8%
Engineering 8 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 7%
Other 21 21%
Unknown 31 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 13. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,687,914
of 25,608,265 outputs
Outputs from Advanced Healthcare Materials
#350
of 2,951 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,418
of 330,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Advanced Healthcare Materials
#6
of 69 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,608,265 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 89th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,951 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 69 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.