You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Identifying and characterizing extrapolation in multivariate response data
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, December 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0225715 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Meridith L. Bartley, Ephraim M. Hanks, Erin M. Schliep, Patricia A. Soranno, Tyler Wagner |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 6 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 14% |
| Australia | 2 | 10% |
| Canada | 1 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 14 | 67% |
| Scientists | 7 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 11% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 3 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 6% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 10 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 8 | 22% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 8% |
| Engineering | 3 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 6% |
| Unknown | 9 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2022.
All research outputs
#1,745,188
of 25,552,933 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#21,373
of 222,796 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#41,533
of 477,519 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#296
of 2,488 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,552,933 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 222,796 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 477,519 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2,488 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.