↓ Skip to main content

The Association Between Computer Use and Cognition Across Adulthood: Use It So You Won't Lose It?

Overview of attention for article published in Psychology and Aging, September 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
188 Mendeley
citeulike
4 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
The Association Between Computer Use and Cognition Across Adulthood: Use It So You Won't Lose It?
Published in
Psychology and Aging, September 2010
DOI 10.1037/a0019543
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Understanding the association between computer use and adult cognition has been limited until now by self-selected samples with restricted ranges of age and education. Here we studied effects of computer use in a large national sample (N = 2,671) of adults aged 32-84, assessing cognition with the Brief Test of Adult Cognition by Telephone (Tun & Lachman, 2005) and executive function with the Stop and Go Switch Task (Tun & Lachman, 2008). Frequency of computer activity was associated with cognitive performance after controlling for age, sex, education, and health status: That is, individuals who used the computer frequently scored significantly higher than those who seldom used the computer. Greater computer use was also associated with better executive function on a task-switching test, even after controlling for basic cognitive ability as well as demographic variables. These findings suggest that frequent computer activity is associated with good cognitive function, particularly executive control, across adulthood into old age, especially for those with lower intellectual ability.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Switzerland 2 1%
Poland 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 176 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 29 15%
Student > Master 25 13%
Student > Bachelor 20 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Researcher 17 9%
Other 37 20%
Unknown 41 22%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 65 35%
Social Sciences 17 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Computer Science 11 6%
Neuroscience 9 5%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 48 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 March 2012.
All research outputs
#21,490,139
of 26,367,306 outputs
Outputs from Psychology and Aging
#1,112
of 1,285 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#97,140
of 107,570 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Psychology and Aging
#4
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,367,306 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,285 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.2. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 107,570 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.