↓ Skip to main content

Cognition and resective surgery for diffuse infiltrative glioma: an overview

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, February 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users
guideline
1 clinical guideline source

Readers on

mendeley
200 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Cognition and resective surgery for diffuse infiltrative glioma: an overview
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, February 2012
DOI 10.1007/s11060-012-0811-x
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

Compared to classical oncological outcome measures such as time to progression and survival, the importance of cognitive functioning in patients with diffuse infiltrative brain tumors has only recently been recognized. Apart from the relatively low incidence and the invariably fatal outcome of gliomas, the general assumption that cognitive assessment is time-consuming and burdensome contributes to this notion. Our understanding of the effects of brain surgery on cognition, for instance, is largely based on studies in surgical patients with refractory epilepsy, with only a limited number of studies in surgical patients with gliomas. The impact of other factors affecting cognition in glioma patients such as direct tumor effects, radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and medical treatment, including anti-epileptic drugs and steroids, have been studied more extensively. The purpose of this paper is to provide an overview of cognition in patients with diffuse infiltrative gliomas and the impact of resective surgery as well as other tumor and treatment-related factors.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 200 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Nepal 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 194 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Other 20 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 19 10%
Researcher 18 9%
Other 41 21%
Unknown 50 25%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 56 28%
Neuroscience 33 17%
Psychology 28 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 4 2%
Other 11 6%
Unknown 61 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 June 2021.
All research outputs
#8,498,460
of 32,023,687 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,030
of 4,127 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,720
of 192,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,023,687 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 73rd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,127 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 192,653 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.