You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Methylmalonic acid and neutrophil morphometric index in laboratory diagnosis of cobalamin deficiency without macrocytosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Laboratory Hematology, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1111/ijlh.12479 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
D Totoskovic, V Dopsaj, J Martinovic |
| Abstract |
This study aimed to investigate the utility of methylmalonic acid (MMA) and neutrophil Cell Population Data, available on the Beckman Coulter LH750 Analyser (Miami, FL, USA), in laboratory assessment of cobalamin status in patients at risk of cobalamin deficiency, without macrocytosis and inflammation. The study group included 189 patients. Neutrophil Cell Population Data along with vitamin B12 and homocysteine were assessed in regard to MMA tertile groups. Statistically significant differences were between lower and upper MMA tertile in serum B12 (P ˂ 0.001), homocysteine (P = 0.001) and neutrophil morphometric index, NeS-DW (P = 0.029). Also, serum B12 concentrations were significantly different between lower and middle MMA tertile, P = 0.005. Receiver operating characteristic analysis of NeS-DW ability to detect MMA˃367 nmol/L revealed a significant area under the curve AUC = 0.761 P ˂ 0.001 95% CI 0.693-0.830. Optimal cut-off value was NeS-DW˃3.51% with sensitivity of 74.19% and specificity of 68.87%. In patients at risk of cobalamin deficiency and normal MCV, classification according to MMA revealed cobalamin status differences. Neutrophil morphometric index may be an indicator of early changes in neutrophil nucleus morphology caused by impaired cobalamin status. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 12 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 12 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 42% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 17% |
| Professor | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 17% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 8% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 1 | 8% |
| Neuroscience | 1 | 8% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#15,951,607
of 24,477,448 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
#353
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#172,992
of 304,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Laboratory Hematology
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,477,448 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,928 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.