↓ Skip to main content

Using molecular classification to predict gains in maximal aerobic capacity following endurance exercise training in humans

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (98th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
5 blogs
twitter
24 X users
facebook
3 Facebook pages
googleplus
2 Google+ users
reddit
3 Redditors
q&a
1 Q&A thread

Readers on

mendeley
453 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Article details
Title
Using molecular classification to predict gains in maximal aerobic capacity following endurance exercise training in humans
Published in
Journal of Applied Physiology, February 2010
DOI 10.1152/japplphysiol.01295.2009
Pubmed ID
Authors
Abstract

A low maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) is a strong risk factor for premature mortality. Supervised endurance exercise training increases VO2max with a very wide range of effectiveness in humans. Discovering the DNA variants that contribute to this heterogeneity typically requires substantial sample sizes. In the present study, we first use RNA expression profiling to produce a molecular classifier that predicts VO2max training response. We then hypothesized that the classifier genes would harbor DNA variants that contributed to the heterogeneous VO2max response. Two independent preintervention RNA expression data sets were generated (n=41 gene chips) from subjects that underwent supervised endurance training: one identified and the second blindly validated an RNA expression signature that predicted change in VO2max ("predictor" genes). The HERITAGE Family Study (n=473) was used for genotyping. We discovered a 29-RNA signature that predicted VO2max training response on a continuous scale; these genes contained approximately 6 new single-nucleotide polymorphisms associated with gains in VO2max in the HERITAGE Family Study. Three of four novel candidate genes from the HERITAGE Family Study were confirmed as RNA predictor genes (i.e., "reciprocal" RNA validation of a quantitative trait locus genotype), enhancing the performance of the 29-RNA-based predictor. Notably, RNA abundance for the predictor genes was unchanged by exercise training, supporting the idea that expression was preset by genetic variation. Regression analysis yielded a model where 11 single-nucleotide polymorphisms explained 23% of the variance in gains in VO2max, corresponding to approximately 50% of the estimated genetic variance for VO2max. In conclusion, combining RNA profiling with single-gene DNA marker association analysis yields a strongly validated molecular predictor with meaningful explanatory power. VO2max responses to endurance training can be predicted by measuring a approximately 30-gene RNA expression signature in muscle prior to training. The general approach taken could accelerate the discovery of genetic biomarkers, sufficiently discrete for diagnostic purposes, for a range of physiological and pharmacological phenotypes in humans.

Login to access the Attention Digest and the Sentiment Analysis related to this output.

Timeline Attention over time Attention Score history
Login to access the full charts related to this output.
X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 24 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley demographics

Mendeley demographics

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 453 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Geographical breakdown
Country Count As %
United Kingdom 10 2%
United States 6 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
Brazil 3 <1%
Canada 2 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Norway 1 <1%
Other 5 1%
Unknown 420 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status
Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 70 15%
Researcher 68 15%
Student > Master 44 10%
Student > Bachelor 43 9%
Professor 33 7%
Other 114 25%
Unknown 81 18%
Readers by discipline
Readers by discipline Count As %
Sports and Recreations 101 22%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 81 18%
Medicine and Dentistry 76 17%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 38 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 11 2%
Other 48 11%
Unknown 98 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 63. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2020.
All research outputs
#817,854
of 32,440,278 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Applied Physiology
#434
of 11,262 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#2,894
of 222,983 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Applied Physiology
#4
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 32,440,278 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,262 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,983 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.