You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Concurrent assessment of epidemiological and operational uncertainties for optimal outbreak control: Ebola as a case study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, June 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1098/rspb.2019.0774 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Shou-Li Li, Matthew J. Ferrari, Ottar N. Bjørnstad, Michael C. Runge, Christopher J. Fonnesbeck, Michael J. Tildesley, David Pannell, Katriona Shea |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 22% |
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Philippines | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 67% |
| Scientists | 2 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 11% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 40 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 7 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 13% |
| Engineering | 4 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 4 | 10% |
| Mathematics | 4 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
| Other | 11 | 28% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 April 2020.
All research outputs
#4,610,319
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#6,283
of 11,335 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#86,336
of 367,362 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
#115
of 155 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,335 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 40.4. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 367,362 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 155 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.